![]() If this were a Masters in Architectural theory or a PHD on the same subject then software may not be relevant.Īrchitecture is an applied art to practice you need both theory and vocational skills. I think there should be room in a Master of Architecture program to cover the tools so that you use the tool not the tool using you. ![]() Veuxx, I disagree with the notion that software training has no place in architecture school, a masters in painting will teach you how to use and even make your own brushes and other tools to create your work. ![]() And all that makes people resistant to the changes demanded of them in the school environment. This is even more problematic when you start trying to model complicated forms and customize families bla bla bla. and it is not just that it begs you to produce that level of detail, it is that it draws people into the trap of 3d modeling every inch of a building. In my experience the problem with emphasizing Revit in school is that it is cumbersome. Revit is a different animal all together but not really that difficult to learn basics. ![]() If you can learn one you should be able to transition to the other without too much trouble. Rhino is basically autocad with slightly better 3d capabilities, more plug ins, and slightly worse drafting abilities. They already stated it is a 3 year program, so it is quite likely a masters program for non-arch undergrads, which only makes sense that they would at least try to help students understand the basics of at least one cad program. It's unclear if this person is being taught rhino in a class or if it is being emphisized by the program. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |